Law And Lawyers

Every month or so we get a new lawsuit to deal with at work. I just find it funny that lawyers always back these ridiculous cases! It seems like you can get sued for any little thing in America! The commando is the only gun that has perks! You get steady aim and stopping power with it hahaaaaa

Posted by Kimmy Jane

Rene Hinojosa is accused of posing as a lawyer. Miguel Contreras is accused of finding car accident victims and convincing them to hire Hinojosa. Both are charged with barratry. “Unwanted and unrequested solicitation by attorneys or their employees or people acting on their behalf,” said attorney David Willis. Willis recently filed three lawsuits. He represents four alleged barratry victims of Hinojosa and one alleged barratry victim of well known Valley attorney Ezequiel Reyna. Willis would not comment on what plaintiffs claim happened. Court documents reveal an agent of Hinojosa would appear at car crash victims’ homes, luring them to Hinojosa’s office. Once there, court records show Hinojosa would promise victims thousands of dollars in settlements. In the case of Ezequiel Reyna, court records show a man claiming to work for Reyna, repeatedly called a car crash victim on his phone. Court records state the victim is a disabled veteran and was unsure how the man got his phone number. Once a meeting was set up, court records show the disabled veteran got a business card from a legal assistant with Ezequiel Reyna’s name on it. Willis told Action 4 News the law mandates a person choose legal representation on his or her own, free from any attorney’s influence. “The attorney client relationship is one of the most important relationships there is under the law,” said Willis. “And it is also subject to abuse.” Action 4 News tried contacting both defendants in the lawsuits …

Posted by Amazer

This is a video response to Thinking of filing a false DMCA claim by dprjones www.youtube.com www.copyright.gov The DMCA complaint sent to Youtube must contain: (i) A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. (vi) A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. (f) Misrepresentations. – Any person who knowingly materially misrepresents under this section (1) that material or activity is infringing shall be liable for any damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees, incurred by the alleged infringer. . . ————————————— Under certain rare circumstances you may be able to file a lawsuit anonymously. So says the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit: www.internetdefamationlawblog.com Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant #1, 06-1590-cv (2nd Cir. 2008) the Court found that a plaintiff may only sue anonymously if his need for anonymity outweighs both the prejudice to the opposing party and the publics interest in knowing the plaintiffs identity. It seems to me that you shouldnt have to give up your right to anonymity in Court in order to defend your right to speak anonymously on the internet. This is still unsettled law. I dont know whether a Court would rule that a YouTuber who has …

Posted by Ashley